Dopo l’approvazione della legge di stabilità e dei relativi atti normativi, restano tutte valide le ragioni che hanno spinto i docenti di numerose scuole di Perugia e provincia, come in molte realtà italiane, a promuovere forme di protesta in difesa della scuola pubblica. Ne precisiamo alcune.
1. Investimento nella scuola pubblica dei risparmi ottenuti dai tagli.
I tagli alla scuola pubblica hanno comportato la riduzione del tempo school of training, jobs and a debt of the Ministry to schools about 1milardo of € partially covered by families. Of this saving only 30% was made available to the school.
in part will be used to cover the annual increment of the second half of 2010 but without this ensure the elimination of blocking shots Six Year for the years 2011-2012, provided by L 133/08, or that there are resources for the renewal of the contract the school for the next three years. The reasons for the protest unions are therefore all valid.
2. Evaluation of school and teachers.
The rest ( about 31 of the 350 million saved) will be used for the activation of two experimental projects for the evaluation of schools and to increase remuneration of teachers that stand " general appreciation for a professional within a school "( not specify the criteria is not foreseen the impartiality necessary for a serious assessment and independent ).
Despite the wide availability on the part of teachers and their associations to discuss the question of evaluation, none of the selected schools agreed to the proposal to participate in the ministerial trial. The reasons for this refusal are to be found in the fact that were deleted, for example, the "form" in primary school, the "national plan for information technology" in higher education in disciplines such as law, the second language community and reduced hours of English regardless of the evaluation, the substance, of output, international comparisons, but a unilateral act of the Minister, without the involvement of people living in the world of school, without a debate in the country and even in Parliament.
urge colleagues to reject any request to participate in the trial because they serve only to mask the cuts without a coherent plan for evaluating the school system.
3. overcrowding of classrooms.
I the Lazio Regional Administrative Court upheld the first Italian collective action (class action) against the Public administration. This is the appeal of Codacons against the so-called class-henhouse ', which receive pupils from 35-40, beyond the limits of the law, " with serious consequences for the safety of students and teachers.''Crowding especially early grades, on average between 27 and 30 pupils, prevents high quality teaching for all and open to the risk of "early school" just in time when school begins a journey that should by law be guaranteed to all under 16 years .
The protest continues
Since the treatment rivela un disprezzo per la scuola pubblica e per il valore della cultura, che devono preoccuparci come cittadini, oltre che come insegnanti, confermiamo la volontà di garantire agli studenti il regolare svolgimento dei compiti connessi ai doveri contrattuali (lezioni, attività collegiali, azioni connesse alla realizzazione dell’offerta formativa) ma
· confermiamo l’astensione da sostituzioni, da prestazioni straordinarie e dalla programmazione dei viaggi education and work experience
· invite you to subscribe to the " Petition to President Giorgio Napolitano " because it "calls for the government to reinstate the misappropriated funds with Article 64 of Law 133 of 2008 and return to state schools funds improperly granted to private institutions . ( docentiscuolapubblica . blogspot.com).
0 comments:
Post a Comment